Hey, could you please delete the account
Thank you very much for damaging the image of Freifunk in the HSK area.
What’s supposed to be the point of such a claim, thanks for damaging freifunk’s image in the HSK?!?
At the end of the day, I have the whole thing as a topic again, and if at the end of the day 4830.org decides to do so, to stop supporting the whole thing, and such a questionable thing that a community like Brilon would like to continue, in essence would rather focus on processing, and then to say how we distance ourselves from it is at the core, but not even my problem
If basically I don’t have a partner who provides technical infrastructure, I can’t continue the product either
So where do I personally damage the image myself, I didn’t end the cooperation, so
I admit I don’t understand the sentence, but this much: The restart in Brilon was brought to the attention of the 4830.org e. V. and how the 4830.org e. V. could support it. Agreement was reached on this.
Then it was said that they wanted to expand the sphere of action towards Meschede. Since that lands firmware-wise for new installations in a network, so what. The task of Brilon was never discussed, let alone agreed upon, making a corresponding distancing from it inevitable.
Thanks for clarifying that.
You’re right: for Meschede, I didn’t obtain any concrete approval or binding technical support from 4830.org e.V. in advance. The phrasing in my announcement that there was close technical cooperation for this purpose was therefore too far-reaching and misleading. I’m correcting that.
Going forward, I won’t announce any migrations, technical infrastructure, or support from 4830 for Meschede. First, it needs to be clarified whether and on what basis the project can responsibly be continued at all.
With that, I consider the matter to be factually addressed from my perspective. I won’t conduct any further public discussions about it.
FTR, note the ›Fact Check‹ on this topic complex.